Facing a Complex Embedded Challenge? Start Technical Discovery Within 24h
Equipment & Testing banner

Equipment

& Testing

Plan Your Testing

Broadcast & ProAV Equipment Testing

IP-based broadcast and ProAV devices can fail at scale in real networks. Traffic contention drops frames, PTP drift breaks lip-sync, and multicast routing – these issues are systemic, hard to reproduce, and expensive to fix after deployment.

Promwad engineers validate your product as a complete system — video, audio, network, and control tested together under real load with mixed-vendor systems, multicast delivery, and 24–48h endurance runs — not just lab scenarios.

Why Testing Matters in Broadcast & ProAV

Broadcast and ProAV devices can fail in real IP networks — under real traffic, real synchronization demands, and real load — risking deployments and generating support tickets. 

That is why we validate common failure patterns:

PTP drift breaking
lip-sync
Dropped frames under
traffic contention
Multicast instability
under load
Control path failures in
long-run operation

That's why we don't run isolated device checks. We validate what actually matters — network behavior under contention, time synchronization and lip-sync accuracy, multicast delivery and discovery, and long-run stability over 24–48 hours or more. 

Do you want to ensure predictable behavior in real IP networks: interoperability, timing, and stress scenarios?

Vadim Shilov, Head of Broadcasting & Telecom at Promwad

Business Impact

Where we plug in

We engage at every stage of the product lifecycle: design validation and test strategy setup, pre-production validation, certification and customer acceptance support, field issue reproduction, and scaling when you add more endpoints or move to a new topology. 

What this means for your business

Testing at the system level — before your customers do 

✓ Reduced support costs and customer-facing risks
✓ Accelerated time-to-market for new features and firmware releases
✓ Prevented failures in live production and fewer escalation tickets
✓ Independent validation and test reports for Tier-1 broadcasters  

broadcast who we help

Who This Testing Is For

This service is built for teams that design, build, and integrate IP-based AV products — and need those products to behave predictably in customer networks: 

ProAV product manufacturers, broadcast equipment vendors, and system integrators — particularly CTOs and R&D leaders who need to boost performance, migrate from SDI to IP without breaking schedules, and verify modern standards across mixed-vendor ecosystems. 

When it's needed:

New product launch or
major firmware release
Customer acceptance and
readiness checks
Scaling the system —
more endpoints, new topology
Field issue reproduction

Need to launch ST 2110, NMOS, or NDI support but lack the internal test infrastructure?

We close that gap — so you can ship on schedule and show stable demos at NAB or IBC.

What Exactly We Validate

We organize testing around customer-facing capabilities — not raw protocol lists. Six areas cover the full behavior of an IP AV product.

Interoperability

Behavior across different source types, decoders/endpoints, and the full protocol stack — plus switching behavior. We reproduce the integration-killers: EDID mismatches that leave a screen black, color-space incompatibilities (YCbCr vs. RGB), and latency differences between devices. 

Result: Confirmed compatibility across mixed-vendor ecosystems with evidence of how your device negotiates and switches in a real pipeline. 

Media behavior

Video checked for jitter, packet loss, freeze frames, macroblocking, resync delay, adaptive-bitrate transitions, and resolution/frame-rate changes. Audio checked for dropouts, correct resampling (48 kHz vs. 44.1 kHz), and A/V drift, including lip-sync across synchronized, multi-device environments. 

Result: Video and audio quality verified under real conditions, so degradation is caught before it reaches a live channel. 

USB, KVM & peripheral interactions

USB validated for HID devices, redirection latency, and isochronous devices (webcams, audio interfaces). KVM validated for switching speed, USB state preservation, and hot-plug behavior. We target the field classics: keyboard lag after a switch, USB reconnect delays, and lost HID state. 

Result: Peripheral and KVM paths validated the way operators actually use them, so integrators don't inherit the "keyboard died after I switched users" ticket. 

Network readiness

Stream stability in real switching environments with actual traffic. Multicast behavior and predictable delivery under load. Segmentation and prioritization patterns used in production AV networks. 

Result: Verified compatibility across mixed-vendor ecosystems — with evidence of how your device behaves in a real pipeline, not just in isolation. Multicast delivery and discovery confirmed under load, so integration issues surface in our lab, not at the customer site. 

Performance & stability

Latency and stability under sustained load. Endurance runs of 24–48 hours or longer where required. Power behavior for PoE-powered deployments — including edge cases around power cycling and recovery. 

Result: Traffic contention scenarios tested and documented. Line-rate performance validated. Bottlenecks identified under realistic network conditions — before they become field escalations. 

Control & UX

Web UI, API, and CLI reliability — the paths integrators depend on daily. Companion apps and control workflows. Control-path stability during extended operation, because a UI that locks up after 12 hours is a deployment risk. 

Result: Validated control paths across all interfaces — Web, API, CLI, and companion apps — under real session lengths. Your integrators get a product that stays responsive, not one that needs a workaround after overnight operation.

Device Types & Tools

What we test

  • AV-over-IP transmitters, receivers, and video wall endpoints.
  • KVM-over-IP extenders.
  • Encoders, decoders, and HDMI/SDI gateways.
  • PTZ and IP broadcast cameras.
  • Managed AV and PoE switches and AV network infrastructure.
  • Streaming and recording endpoints. 

Deployment scenarios we cover:

  • multi-endpoint AV-over-IP distribution 
  • mixed device ecosystems with different sources, sinks, and endpoints 
  • control-driven operation through UIs, APIs, and apps in live environments 
 Test Bench Overview

Test Bench Overview

How we test

Software tools

FFmpeg, nmos-cpp, Wireshark, pytest, Docker, TRex

Interfaces supported

SDI, power, GPIO, serial, and audio I/O

Standards we work with

ST 2110, PTP timing, redundancy, NMOS, IPMX, Dante

Lab hardware

- Cameras, encoders, decoders, and endpoints for realistic multi-device setups
- AV-grade PoE network switches
- Video I/O analysis and capture tooling: PRISM, Phabrix QxL, PTP Generator, BridgeTech VB440, and NMOS CPP
- USB emulators for control and peripheral simulation
- Thermal monitoring and environmental chambers as needed

Automation

test execution orchestrated with Jenkins and pytest — for repeatable, scalable test runs across large device matrices

Case Studies

Automated testing for AV configurations

Challenge: A client needed to validate a large number of video and audio combinations across their product line — a task that would take 24–27 hours to execute manually. 

What we built: An automated testing framework that runs the full cycle per combination: firmware update, device configuration, setup verification against the declared parameters, and error-free operation check.  

We also developed a custom audio test bench that injects a test signal at the input and validates the output across 10 interfaces simultaneously. Manual testing was used selectively — only for urgent scenarios during active development. 

Test equipment used: PRISM, MultiView 4, QxL, and SPG8000A. 

Automated testing for AV configurations

Results: 3,000 test scenarios executed in 4 hours. Significant reduction in repetitive manual configuration and validation work. 

IPTV/OTT platform testing 

End-to-end testing of a complete IPTV/OTT solution — from backend middleware and sub-system integrations (CRM, billing, media server).  

Prototype testing, test case development, clean installation and update flows, smoke testing, full functionality checks, and extended test cycles for both web and mobile clients. 

Covered TV applications across seven platforms: Web, LG, Samsung, Android TV, Android, iOS, and Fire TV. 

Tools used: Tizen Studio, Web OS TV IDE, Android Studio, Visual Studio Code.

IPTV/OTT platform testing

IP camera test environment

Scope: Building a dedicated test environment for IP camera firmware and cloud integration. 

What we covered: API-level testing through a cloud interface. Scripted validation of camera interfaces and modules. Cloud server workflows including install, update, and stress testing under sustained load. 

IP camera test environment

Why Promwad

We validate broadcast equipment as systems — video, audio, network, and control — all four layers tested together, under realistic conditions, on real infrastructure.

Why companies choose our engineering & QA team:

SDI → IP migration expertise
SDI → IP migration expertise

practical transition to IP-based workflows without disrupting existing production chains

Ultra-low latency focus
Latency-driven design

defined latency budgets and performance validation under load ensure deterministic behaviour in real-world environments

EU-based extension of your R&D team
EU-based extension of your R&D team

we integrate into your processes and roadmap, reducing hiring and delivery risks. More about Promwad

20 years, 500+ projects
Trusted by Sony, Vestel & other top-tier brands

proven delivery across 25+ countries with strong expertise in real-time environments

20 years, 500+ projects
End-to-end engineering under one roof

hardware and FPGA, embedded software, device applications and cloud components — all-in-one for faster time-to-market

Chip-vendor agnostic engineering
Production-ready engineering deliverables

architecture pack and API/SDK integration notes aligned with customer ecosystems

Let's Plan Your Testing Project

Whether you're preparing a product launch, reproducing a field issue, or scaling to a new topology — we'll help you validate system behavior before your customers do.

Tell us about your project

We’ll review it carefully and get back to you with the best technical approach.

All information you share stays private and secure — NDA available upon request.

Prefer direct email?
Write to info@promwad.com

Secured call with our expert in 24h
Secured call with our expert in 24h
Secured call with our expert in 24h
Plug-in model for your full-cycle R&D
Secured call with our expert in 24h
22 years of engineering expertise
Secured call with our expert in 24h
500+ projects for OEMs in EU & US
Secured call with our expert in 24h
MVP in 8–10 weeks — predictable delivery
Secured call with our expert in 24h
Featured at IBC, Embedded World, MWC

FAQ

What types of broadcast and ProAV devices do you test?

 

We test the full range of IP-based AV products: AV-over-IP transmitters, receivers, and video wall endpoints, KVM-over-IP extenders, encoders, decoders, HDMI/SDI gateways, PTZ and IP broadcast cameras, managed AV and PoE switches, and streaming and recording endpoints. If your device carries media over an IP network, our test bench is built to handle it.
 

What standards and protocols does your testing cover?

 

We work with ST 2110, PTP timing and redundancy, NMOS, IPMX, and Dante. Our validation covers not just protocol compliance but real-world behavior — how your device handles synchronization, multicast delivery, and stream switching in environments that mirror actual customer deployments. This includes network segmentation and prioritization patterns commonly used in production AV networks.
 

How is system-level testing different from standard QA?

 

Standard QA typically checks a device in isolation — one input, one output, controlled conditions. We test systems: multiple devices connected through real switches, with real traffic contention, real PTP synchronization, and real failure and recovery scenarios. Video, audio, network, and control are validated together because that is how problems appear in the field. The result is evidence-based reporting your engineering team can act on — not a checkbox that says passed.
 

How long does a typical testing engagement take?

 

It depends on scope. A focused interoperability check against a specific device matrix can take days. A full pre-production validation with endurance runs of 24–48 hours and automated regression across thousands of configurations takes longer — but we have built tooling to compress that timeline significantly. In one project, we executed 3,000 test scenarios in 4 hours using our automated framework, compared to an estimated 24–27 hours for the same scope manually. We can scope a realistic timeline after reviewing your product and target scenarios.
 

At what stage should we engage Promwad for testing?

 

The earlier, the better — but we plug in at any stage. Ideally, we start with design validation and test strategy setup so testing is part of your engineering flow from the beginning. But we also handle pre-production validation before a major release, customer acceptance and certification support, field issue reproduction when something breaks in deployment, and scaling validation when you are adding endpoints or changing network topology. Whether you are preparing for NAB or IBC demos, or responding to a Tier-1 broadcaster’s request for third-party test reports, we can define the right engagement model.